Anush Matasakian v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 202120-71573California717 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANUSH MATASAKIAN; ANZHELIKA No. 20-71573
KIRAKOSIAN; ARAM OVSEPOVICH
KIRAKOSIAN; ARMAN KIRAKOSIAN, Agency Nos. A208-600-878
A208-600-879
Petitioners, A208-600-472
A208-600-473
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 20, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: BADE and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BERMAN,*** District Judge.
Petitioners Anush Matsakian (“Anush”), her husband, Aram Ovsepovich
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Kirakosian…