Anush Matasakian v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 202120-71573California717 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANUSH MATASAKIAN; ANZHELIKA No. 20-71573

KIRAKOSIAN; ARAM OVSEPOVICH

KIRAKOSIAN; ARMAN KIRAKOSIAN, Agency Nos. A208-600-878

A208-600-879

Petitioners, A208-600-472

A208-600-473

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 20, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: BADE and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and BERMAN,*** District Judge.

Petitioners Anush Matsakian (“Anush”), her husband, Aram Ovsepovich

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Kirakosian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.