People v. Moore CA2/8

statement of facts but raising no issues. At our request, counsel augmented the record. Counsel then filed a second Wende brief asking this court to review the record independently and to determine whether any arguable issues exist on appeal. Moore submitted two supplemental briefs, one in connection with each of counsel’s Wende briefs. We have reviewed the supplemental briefs and the entire record, including the augmented material. No arguable issues exist. We affirm. Statutory citations are to the Penal Code. I We recount the pertinent factual and procedural background. An amended information charged Moore with three counts of second degree robbery and three counts of assault with a firearm. Court-appointed counsel represented Moore. On August 21, 2019, the trial court held a Marsden hearing. (People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden).) The judge found Moore’s lawyer to be “an excellent lawyer” who “really has been working very diligently” on Moore’s case. Two of the charged robberies took place on September 20, 2015, at a Pizza Hut and a Chevron a few miles away. Each victim, a shift manager at the Pizza Hut and a cashier at the Chevron, testified at trial. Each testified…