People v. Zackery CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 2021H048522California1,369 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manoukian, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Reginald Charles Zackery, Jr. pleaded no contest to criminal threats (Pen. Code, § 422, subd. (a)),1 misdemeanor battery on the mother of his child (§ 243, subd. (e)(1)), misdemeanor criminal contempt for violating a protective order (§ 166, subd. (c)(1)), and misdemeanor vandalism (§ 594, subd. (b)(1)). The trial court placed defendant on probation with various terms and conditions, including that he serve 180 days in county jail and pay victim restitution. Defendant’s appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) that states the case and facts but raises no issue. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument on his own behalf within 30 days. That period has elapsed, and we have received no response from defendant.

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated. As we will explain, pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106 (Kelly), we have reviewed the entire record and determined that there is no arguable issue on appeal other than the correction of a clerical error in the clerk’s sentencing minutes. Therefore,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.