United States v. Roosevelt Jones

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10386

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:18-cr-00008-APG-NJK-1 v. 2:18-cr-00008-APG-NJK

ROOSEVELT JONES,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 18, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Roosevelt Jones appeals from the district court’s revocation of his

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Jones argues the district court abused its discretion when it relied on the victim’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). testimony, which he deems unreliable, to find…