United States v. Michael Mirando

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 202119-50384California1,223 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-50384

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:16-cr-00215-PA-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MICHAEL MIRANDO, AKA Michael John Mirando,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 21, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, OWENS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Michael Mirando appeals from the district court’s order

resentencing him to 87 months in prison for healthcare fraud in violation of

U.S.C. § 1347. Mirando owned Holter Labs, LLC, a company that provided

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). cardiac monitoring services for physicians through portable devices called Holter

recorders, and his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.