Theresa Brooke v. Balaji Alameda LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 202120-17236California797 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THERESA BROOKE, No. 20-17236

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-02736-SK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PHILIP H. STILLMAN,

Appellant,

and

BALAJI ALAMEDA LLC,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Sallie Kim, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 21, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: BADE and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SESSIONS,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William K. Sessions III, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. Attorney Philip Stillman (“Stillman”) appeals an order issuing sanctions against

him. Stillman claims the district court violated his due process rights. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.