Lisa Kouball v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 202120-56069California397 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 25 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LISA KOUBALL, on behalf of herself, No. 20-56069 and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 3:20-cv-00870-CAB-BGS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SEAWORLD PARKS AND

ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 20, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kouball alleges that she bought annual passes to SeaWorld San Diego on a

monthly payment plan. She alleges that when SeaWorld closed due to COVID, it

continued charging Kouball’s credit card, so Kouball brought this class action

lawsuit. The district court dismissed all her claims and Kouball…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.