Jose Castilla-Florian v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 202120-72720California852 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 25 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE CASTILLA-FLORIAN, No. 20-72720
Petitioner, Agency No. A205-024-703
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 21, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: BADE and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SESSIONS,*** District Judge.
Jose Castilla-Florian (“Castilla-Florian”), a native and citizen of Peru who
operated an independent newspaper in that country, petitions for review of the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William K. Sessions III, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration
judge’s…