Jose Castilla-Florian v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 202120-72720California852 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE CASTILLA-FLORIAN, No. 20-72720

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-024-703

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 21, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: BADE and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SESSIONS,*** District Judge.

Jose Castilla-Florian (“Castilla-Florian”), a native and citizen of Peru who

operated an independent newspaper in that country, petitions for review of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William K. Sessions III, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration

judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.