Jessie Flores v. W. Sullivan
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 202120-55817California768 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 25 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JESSIE FLORES, No. 20-55817
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:17-cv-00434-VBF(MRW) v.
W.J. SULLIVAN, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 21, 2021** Pasadena, California
Before: R. NELSON and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and SCHREIER***, District Judge.
Jessie Flores appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas
corpus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 2253, 2254, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. 1. The…