Jairo Aparicio v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 202120-71000California559 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIRO GUARDADO APARICIO, No. 20-71000

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-855-186

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 21, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: R. NELSON and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and SCHREIER,*** District Judge.

Jairo Aparicio, a citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s denial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal under the Immigration

and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.