Ivan Lee v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 202120-17003California874 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IVAN LEE, an individual, No. 20-17003

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00118-JAM-EFB v.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 19, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and BEA, Circuit Judges, and VITALIANO,*** District Judge.

Appellant Ivan Lee, a street construction laborer for the City of Sacramento,

filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eric N. Vitaliano, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.