Usdol

Bernadine Poulter v. Usdol

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 202120-72978California884 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 25 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BERNADINE POULTER, No. 20-72978

Petitioner, LABR-1: ARB No. 2018-0056

v.

MEMORANDUM*

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR;

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD,

Respondents,

CENTRAL CAL TRANSPORTATION,

LLC; RYAN ROTAN,

Intervenors.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Labor

Argued and Submitted October 8, 2021 Portland, Oregon

Before: W. FLETCHER, IKUTA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge W. FLETCHER

Bernadine Poulter petitions for review of a final decision and order issued by

the U.S. Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (ARB) which

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. reversed a ruling by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) finding in favor of

Poulter. We have jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. § 31105(d), and we deny the

petition.

Poulter argues that the ARB erred in holding that the ALJ’s finding that

Poulter had engaged in an activity protected…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.