Alejandro Guzman v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 202119-72159California898 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO GUZMAN, AKA Alejandro No. 19-72159 Deniz, Agency No. A098-345-482 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and BEA, Circuit Judges, and VITALIANO,*** District Judge.

Alejandro Guzman (“Guzman”) petitions for review the Board of

Immigration’s (“BIA”) summary dismissal of his application for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eric N. Vitaliano, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. withholding of removal under INA § 241(b)(3), and withholding of removal under

the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.