Alarazim Kassim v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 202120-71242California964 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALARAZIM KASSIM, No. 20-71242

Petitioner, Agency No. A046-708-731

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 21, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: BADE and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SESSIONS,*** District Judge.

Alarazim Kassim, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions for review of

a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William K. Sessions III, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. removal proceedings. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.