Walter Espinoza Orellana v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 202118-71606California1,672 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 26 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WALTER AMILCAR ESPINOZA No. 18-71606
ORELLANA,
Agency No. A206-272-122 Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 22, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: BERZON, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Walter Amilcar Espinoza Orellana (“Espinoza Orellana”)—a native and
citizen of El Salvador—petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
(“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Espinoza
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Orellana’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under
the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have…