Walter Espinoza Orellana v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 202118-71606California1,672 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WALTER AMILCAR ESPINOZA No. 18-71606

ORELLANA,

Agency No. A206-272-122 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 22, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: BERZON, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Walter Amilcar Espinoza Orellana (“Espinoza Orellana”)—a native and

citizen of El Salvador—petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Espinoza

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Orellana’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.