Gerrie Dekker v. Vivint Solar, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 202120-16584California779 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERRIE DEKKER; et al., No. 20-16584

Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-07918-WHA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

VIVINT SOLAR, INC.; et al.,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 18, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: BADE and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SESSIONS,*** District Judge.

Vivint Solar appeals the district court’s order vacating its prior order

compelling arbitration between Vivint and Plaintiffs Karen Barajas (as executor of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William K. Sessions III, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. the Bryson estate) and Gennie…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.