Eric Lund v. State of California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 202120-17133California905 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIC LUND; SUSANNAH LUND, No. 20-17133

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-02287-JAM-DMC v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 7, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Eric and Susannah Lund appeal the dismissal of their civil action alleging

multiple federal and state law claims against numerous defendants, including the

State of California; the California Highway Patrol (“CHP”); the City of Vacaville,

California; Solano County; the Solano County District Attorney’s Office; and

individual employees of each. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.