Eric Lund v. State of California
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 202120-17133California905 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 26 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ERIC LUND; SUSANNAH LUND, No. 20-17133
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-02287-JAM-DMC v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 7, 2021 San Francisco, California
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and HAWKINS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Eric and Susannah Lund appeal the dismissal of their civil action alleging
multiple federal and state law claims against numerous defendants, including the
State of California; the California Highway Patrol (“CHP”); the City of Vacaville,
California; Solano County; the Solano County District Attorney’s Office; and
individual employees of each. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. review…