David Cottrell v. At&t Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 26 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID COTTRELL, No. 20-16162
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-07672-JCS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
AT&T INC.; et al.,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 8, 2021 Submission Vacated June 15, 2021 Resubmitted October 7, 2021 Seattle, Washington
Before: GILMAN,** GOULD, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
David Cottrell brought this putative class action asserting claims under
California law against AT&T Inc. and associated companies (collectively,
“AT&T”) based on his allegations that AT&T improperly charged its customers
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. for DIRECTV Now accounts without…