Faa

City of Los Angeles v. Faa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 202119-73164California1,004 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, No. 19-73164

Petitioner,

BENEDICT HILLS ESTATES MEMORANDUM*

ASSOCIATION; BENEDICT HILLS

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Petitioners-Intervenors,

v.

FEDERAL AVIATION

ADMINISTRATION; STEPHEN M.

DICKSON, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Aviation Administration

Argued and Submitted September 14, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, BERZON, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Los Angeles (“the City”) seeks this court’s review, under 49 U.S.C. § 46110,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. of a letter the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) sent the City in response

to one the City sent the agency. In its letter, the City alleged the FAA had admitted

to changing flight procedures—specifically, that it was now intentionally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.