Birdevinder Tiwana v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 202120-71634California607 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BIRDEVINDER SINGH TIWANA; et al., No. 20-71634

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A206-594-962

A206-594-963

v. A206-594-964

A206-594-965

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 22, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: WATFORD and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and BAKER,*** International Trade Judge.

Birdevinder Singh Tiwana, his wife Rawinder Kaur Tiwana, and their two

children, citizens of India, petition for review of a decision of the Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable M. Miller Baker, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.