In re J.D.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 27, 2021A161973MCalifornia15,379 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stewart, J.

Filed 10/27/21 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re J.D., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

SAN FRANCISCO HUMAN

SERVICES AGENCY, A161973

Plaintiff and Respondent, (San Francisco County Super. v. Court No. JD18-3156)

R.T.,

ORDER MODIFIYING OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

AND DENYING PETITION FOR

REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

BY THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on September 29, 2021, be modified as follows: 1. The first two full paragraphs on page 16, beginning “The agency had far less to say” and ending “exclusively during cross-examination,” are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following paragraphs: With respect to the relationship between mother and son, the agency reported only the following: “[J.D.] has a good relationship with his mother. [J.D.] and [mother] have been having virtual visits since March of 2020. However, because [mother’s] family reunification services were terminated back in August of 2020, the Agency…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.