People v. Chessman CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 27, 2021B311528California1,254 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/27/21 P. v. Chessman CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE, B311528

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA266098) v.

KELVIN SCOTT CHESSMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Kathleen Kennedy, Judge. Dismissed. Richard B. Lennon and Cheryl Lutz, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. —————————— Kelvin Scott Chessman appeals from an order denying his postjudgment motion to waive or modify a $10,000 restitution fine imposed pursuant to Penal Code1 section 1202.4, subdivision (b). His appellate counsel has filed a brief asking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.