Julius Cho v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 27, 202120-71615California851 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 27 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIUS NDI CHO, No. 20-71615

Petitioner, Agency No. A096-411-651

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 21, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: WATFORD and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and BAKER,*** International Trade Judge.

Julius Ndi Cho, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of a

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order denying his untimely motion to reopen

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable M. Miller Baker, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. Page 2 of

removal proceedings. We deny the petition for review as to that issue…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.