Lord
Lord v. Mancino CA1/3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 10/27/21 Lord v. Mancino CA1/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
EDWIN FREDERICK LORD,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
A161323
v. HARMONY RENE MANCINO, (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. CCH-20-582872) Defendant and Appellant.
Harmony Rene Mancino appeals after the trial court granted Edwin Frederick Lord a civil harassment restraining order against her. We conclude the evidence does not support a finding that there is a likelihood of future harassment. We therefore reverse the order.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Mancino and Lord are housemates in a two-story house in San Francisco. On the lower floor, Lord occupies one bedroom and a resident named Tom (who acts as property manager) occupies another, and there is a…