Lord

Lord v. Mancino CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 27, 2021A161323California2,268 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/27/21 Lord v. Mancino CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

EDWIN FREDERICK LORD,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A161323

v. HARMONY RENE MANCINO, (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. CCH-20-582872) Defendant and Appellant.

Harmony Rene Mancino appeals after the trial court granted Edwin Frederick Lord a civil harassment restraining order against her. We conclude the evidence does not support a finding that there is a likelihood of future harassment. We therefore reverse the order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Mancino and Lord are housemates in a two-story house in San Francisco. On the lower floor, Lord occupies one bedroom and a resident named Tom (who acts as property manager) occupies another, and there is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.