Robeena Babkhanian v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202115-70512California555 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBEENA BABKHANIAN, No. 15-70512

Petitioner, Agency No. A075-649-389

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: R. NELSON and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and SCHREIER,*** District Judge.

Robeena Babkhanian petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA) denial of her second motion to reopen removal proceedings. “We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 to review final orders of removal.” Wang

v. Sessions, 861…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.