Robeena Babkhanian v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202115-70512California555 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBEENA BABKHANIAN, No. 15-70512
Petitioner, Agency No. A075-649-389
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 19, 2021** Pasadena, California
Before: R. NELSON and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and SCHREIER,*** District Judge.
Robeena Babkhanian petitions for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ (BIA) denial of her second motion to reopen removal proceedings. “We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation. have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 to review final orders of removal.” Wang
v. Sessions, 861…