Nicholas Scoyni v. Daniel Salvador

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202120-35123California1,133 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 28 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NICHOLAS D. SCOYNI, Nos. 20-35123 20-35564 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00506-BLW v.

DANIEL R. SALVADOR; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 26, 2021 **

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges

Nicholas Scoyni appeals pro se the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of Defendants (No. 20-35123) and the district court’s grant of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). costs and attorney’s fees to Defendants (No. 20-35564). We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. The district court did not err in granting summary judgment to Defendants

for (A) breach…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.