Nicholas Scoyni v. Daniel Salvador
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
OCT 28 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NICHOLAS D. SCOYNI, Nos. 20-35123 20-35564 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00506-BLW v.
DANIEL R. SALVADOR; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 26, 2021 **
Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges
Nicholas Scoyni appeals pro se the district court’s grant of summary
judgment in favor of Defendants (No. 20-35123) and the district court’s grant of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). costs and attorney’s fees to Defendants (No. 20-35564). We have jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
1. The district court did not err in granting summary judgment to Defendants
for (A) breach…