Rossdale CLE v. Walton CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 2021H046441California4,710 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

Filed 10/28/21 Rossdale CLE v. Walton CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

ROSSDALE CLE, INC., d/b/a THE H046441 ROSSDALE GROUP, LLC, (Santa Cruz County Super. Ct. No. CV179135) Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

TIMOTHY WALTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Plaintiff Rossdale CLE, Inc. sued defendant Timothy Walton for malicious prosecution after Rossdale was granted judgment on the pleadings in an underlying case brought by Walton about unsolicited e-mail marketing. After a court trial, the court entered judgment in favor of Rossdale on its malicious prosecution cause of action and ordered Walton to pay over $230,000 in damages. On appeal, Walton argues the trial court erred in finding that Rossdale satisfied the probable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.