People v. Evans CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 2021B309393California578 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

In 1987, a jury found appellant Kenneth Evans guilty of murder and two counts of attempted murder. The jury found true allegations that appellant personally used a firearm in the commission of all three offenses. According to the evidence at trial, appellant shot multiple members of a rival gang, killing one and injuring two others.1 Following his conviction, appellant was sentenced to 27 years to life in prison. In 2019, appellant filed a petition for relief under Penal Code section 1170.95, asking the court to vacate his murder conviction under Senate Bill No. 1437 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.), which eliminated the natural and probable consequences theory as a basis for murder liability and narrowed the felony murder rule. (People v. Johns (2020) 50 Cal.App.5th 46, 57-58.) The superior court appointed counsel for appellant. The prosecution filed an opposition, arguing that appellant was ineligible for relief because the record of conviction established that appellant was the actual killer, and thus that he was not convicted based on the natural and probable consequences theory or the felony murder rule. Appellant’s counsel filed no reply. In November 2020, the superior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.