Steele

Steele v. Mutt McGrew CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 2021G058827California1,753 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goethals, J.

Filed 10/28/21 Steele v. Mutt McGrew CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

DELBERT CHARLES STEELE,

G058827

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2019-01048775) v.

OPINION

MUTT MCGREW, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Charles Margines, Judge. Affirmed. Appellant’s request for judicial notice granted in part. Respondent’s request for judicial notice denied. Delbert Charles Steele, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Freeman Mathis & Gary, Stephen M. Caine and Marie E. Colmey for Defendant and Respondent. * * * Delbert Charles Steele appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his lawsuit for failure to prosecute it. Steele failed to appear at the case management conference…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.