Pini

Pini v. Pickett CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 2021C090660California3,959 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Filed 10/29/21 Pini v. Pickett CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Trinity) ----

FIRENZA PINI, C090660

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 19CV043)

v.

KENNETH WAYNE PICKETT et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff Firenza Pini challenges the trial court’s granting of an anti-SLAPP motion brought by defendants Kenneth Pickett, Deidre Pickett, and Linda Dunham (collectively defendants).1 Pini also challenges the trial court’s award of attorney fees

“Anti-SLAPP” refers to the procedural vehicle provided by Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (section 425.16) to strike legal actions intended as a “strategic lawsuit against public participation.” (Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.