U.S. Gold & Silver Investments, Inc. v. The United States of America Ex Rel. Director, U.S. Mint J. Aron & Company

Good Law
885 F.2d 620·1989 WL 105117·12 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1237·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13800
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 15, 198987-4069California696 words

Opinion

Opinion

The plaintiff in this action is U.S. Gold & Silver Investments, Inc., a company engaged in the business of selling gold bullion and other metals. It brought this action against the United States and J. Aron & Company (“Aron”) claiming that the United States Mint and Aron misappropriated the plaintiffs trade name when they marketed and sold gold medallions, minted by the United States, under the name “U.S. Gold.” The plaintiff sought damages against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (1982) (FTCA), and against Aron under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (a) (1982). The district court awarded summary judgment in favor of each defendant in two separate reported opinions. U.S. Gold & Silver Invs., Inc. v. Director, U.S. Mint, 656 F.Supp. 380 (D.Or.1987); 682 F.Supp. 484 (D.Or.1987).

The basic underlying facts and the rationale for the district court’s analysis of the merits of plaintiff’s trade name infringement claim are set forth in the district court’s opinion reported at 682 F.Supp. 484 . The district court held that the plaintiff had shown no protectable interest in the trade name “U.S. Gold” because the term is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.