Travenia

Travenia v. Law Office of Harry E. Hudson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 1, 2021C092296California3,966 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

Filed 11/1/21 Travenia v. Law Office of Harry E. Hudson CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

KAREN TRAVENIA, C092296

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No.

STKCVUPN2015000091)

v.

LAW OFFICE OF HARRY E. HUDSON et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff Karen Travenia, representing herself in pro. per., appeals from the trial court’s order granting the motion for nonsuit brought by defendants Harry E. Hudson and the Law Offices of Harry E. Hudson (collectively Hudson) following the parties’ opening statements. Hudson verbally moved for nonsuit on the ground Travenia had not identified evidence supporting her legal malpractice claim and had presented no evidence as to her other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.