Marcus S. Smith Hildegard U. Smith v. William Marshall, Jr., M.D.

Bad Law
885 F.2d 650·1989 WL 109467·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14415
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 198988-5757California2,705 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

This is a medical malpractice suit against a military physician. Jurisdiction in the district court was founded on diversity of citizenship. The case presents two questions never addressed by this circuit: (1) whether an American military physician working in a foreign country is immune from a malpractice suit under 10 U.S.C. § 1089 (1982) and (2) whether the physician is immune from suit under the recently enacted Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988 (“FELRTCA”). FELRTCA, Pub.L. No. 100-694,102 Stat. 4563 (1988). The district court dismissed the complaint against the physician, substituted the United States as a defendant, and then dismissed the action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Sergeant Marcus Smith was stationed in Italy. William Marshall, M.D. worked as a military physician in the Army medical facility in Vicenza, Italy. He treated Hilde-gard Smith, Sergeant Smith’s wife, during the birth of the Smiths’ son, Dominique. The Smiths allege that, as a result of Dr. Marshall’s negligence, Dominique sustained massive brain damage.

After the briefs were filed in this appeal, Congress…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.