Ricardo Acuna-Munoz v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 3, 202120-72032California1,203 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 3 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICARDO ACUNA-MUNOZ, No. 20-72032
Petitioner, Agency No. A206-354-109
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 8, 2021** Seattle, Washington
Before: PAEZ, M. SMITH, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Ricardo Acuna-Munoz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming
the denial by an immigration judge (“IJ”) of his application for withholding of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 Acuna-