Tufa Iuvale v. Coastal Marine Services

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 202119-71172California2,821 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 5 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

TUFA IUVALE, No. 19-71172 Petitioner, BRB Nos. 18-0159 18-0159A v.

COASTAL MARINE SERVICES, MEMORANDUM*

Employer; SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier; DIRECTOR, OFFICE

OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board

Submitted September 3, 2020** Seattle, Washington

Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Memorandum joined by Judge BYBEE and Judge COLLINS; Dissent by Judge TASHIMA

Tufa Iuvale petitions for review of the decision of the Benefits Review

Board (“BRB”) affirming the amount of attorney’s fees and costs awarded to his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). attorney, Jeffrey Winter, by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.