Faa
City of Sacramento v. Faa
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
NOV 5 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, No. 20-72150
Petitioner,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
FEDERAL AVIATION
ADMINISTRATION; STEPHEN M.
DICKSON, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of Orders of the Federal Aviation Administration
Argued and Submitted September 1, 2021 San Francisco, California
Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner City of Sacramento (City) filed a petition for review asserting that
Respondent Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amended five flight
procedures without complying with the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. § 44715(a)(1)(A), the Noise Control Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. § 4903(a), the FAA
Reauthorization Act of 2018, Pub. L. 115-254, § 175, 132 Stat. 3186 (Oct. 5,
2018),1 the Vision 100 - Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act of 2003 ( Pub. L.