Brian Whitaker v. Smb Group

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 202120-55838California1,388 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 5 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN WHITAKER, No. 20-55838

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-06877-MWF-AGR v.

SMB GROUP, a California limited MEMORANDUM* partnership; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 11, 2021 Seattle, Washington

Before: EBEL,** BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Brian Whitaker appeals the district court’s partial fee award totaling $11,349,

roughly half of the $20,459 in attorneys’ fees that Whitaker requested. Specifically,

Whitaker argues that the district court erred by: (1) denying compensation for hours

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. spent on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.