Providence Industries v. Lularoe CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. FACTS
Providence’s initial complaint in this matter was filed in November 2018. The
case garnered some degree of public attention, including news stories and discussion on
various public websites.
On September 19, 2019, outside counsel for Providence, Reed Smith, LLP (Reed
Smith) received an anonymous letter relating to the litigation. The letter was processed
in the usual manner for incoming mail correspondence in the matter; it was scanned by a
secretary, saved to the electronic client file, and distributed by email to the litigation team
and Providence’s in-house general counsel.
2 A Reed Smith lawyer representing Providence, Marsha Houston, skimmed the
letter and became concerned that “it appeared to possibly contain a page of confidential
material that was not public.” She expressed her concern to another attorney on the
litigation team, Chris Rivas. Rivas, too, skimmed the document, and he agreed with
Houston that it might contain confidential material. Rivas and Houston recognized that
the document appeared to be from the same source as three other anonymous
communications received within the previous month. Those earlier communications had
not appeared…