Doe

Doe v. Damron

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 2021A161078MCalifornia3,488 words

Opinion

Opinion

Burns, J.

Filed 11/9/21 (unmodified opn. attached)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

A161078

JANE DOE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Napa County Super. Ct. No. v. 19CV001762)

SCOTT DAMRON,

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

Defendant and Respondent. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.264(c)(1), the opinion filed on October 20, 2021, shall be MODIFIED as follows: 1. On page 8, in Discussion B.3., a new paragraph is in- serted immediately following the first paragraph in that section as follows:

This inquiry calls for a weighing of inter- ests. (Burger King, supra, 471 U.S. at pp. 476-477.) Relevant interests include, among others, the forum state’s interest in adjudicating the case, the plaintiff’s in- terest in obtaining convenient and effec- tive relief, and the burden on the defend- ant of appearing in the forum. (Id. at p. 477.)

2. On page 8, the very next paragraph (now the third paragraph in Discussion B.3.; previously the second paragraph in that section) is modi- fied as follows:

1 i. The word “First” is deleted so that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.