Julio Ruiz -Arciniega v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 202117-73337California1,175 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 10 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO CESAR RUIZ -ARCINIEGA, No. 17-73337

Petitioner, Agency No. A078-081-951

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 8, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Julio Cesar Ruiz-Arciniega (“Ruiz”) petitions for review of Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decisions denying relief under the Convention

Against Torture (“CAT”) and denying his motion to reopen proceedings. We review

the denial of CAT relief for substantial evidence. Arteaga v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 940, 944 (9th Cir. 2007). We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of

discretion.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.