Dennis Baadsgaard v. Safeco Insurance Company of Il

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 202120-36104California373 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 10 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DENNIS BAADSGAARD; SHELLY No. 20-36104

BAADSGAARD,

D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00075-BMM Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF

ILLINOIS, a Liberty Mutual Company,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Dennis and Shelly Baadsgaard appeal from the district court’s entry of

summary judgment for Safeco Insurance Co., denial of the Baadsgaards’

application for additional discovery, and denial of the Baadsgaards’ objection to a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). pretrial protective discovery order. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.