White

White v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company

Good Law
885 F.2d 876
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 198936-3_1California689 words

Opinion

Opinion

885 F.2d 876 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Susan L. WHITE, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-6265. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 8, 1989. Decided Sept. 11, 1989. Before BROWNING, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Susan White appeals from an order denying her motion for class certification and from an order granting Firestone summary judgment on her claims of sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We affirm. 3 White argues that the trial court erred in refusing to certify a class of all women who applied for jobs as retail salespersons or general servicepersons in Firestone's Los Angeles market since June 27, 1985, all women who would apply for such jobs in the future, and all women who had been or would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.