Baerbel McKinney-drobnis v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC
16 F.4th 594
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 202120-15539California10,113 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BAERBEL MCKINNEY-DROBNIS; No. 20-15539
JOSEPH B. PICCOLA; CAMILLE
BERLESE, individually and on behalf D.C. No. of all others similarly situated, 3:16-cv-06450- Plaintiffs-Appellees, MMC
v.
OPINION
KURT ORESHACK,
Objector-Appellant,
v.
MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING, LLC,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 8, 2021 Seattle, Washington
Filed October 20, 2021 MCKINNEY-DROBNIS V. ORESHACK
Before: Ronald Lee Gilman, * Ronald M. Gould, and Eric D. Miller, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Gould; Concurrence by Judge Miller
SUMMARY **
Class Action Settlement
The panel vacated the district court’s judgment overruling objections, certifying a class for settlement, approving the settlement, and granting most of class counsel’s requested fee award in a class action arising out of a dispute between Massage Envy Franchising, LLC (“MEF”), a membership-based spa-services company, and a putative nationwide class of…