Paul Pavulak v. Barbara Von Blanckensee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 1, 202119-16314California1,679 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAUL E. PAVULAK, No. 19-16314 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 4:19-cv-00274-RM-JR

BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE, ORDER AND

Respondent-Appellee. AMENDED OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 16, 2021 San Francisco, California

Filed August 4, 2021 Amended October 1, 2021

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.

Order; Per Curiam Opinion SUMMARY*

Habeas Corpus

The panel withdrew a per curiam opinion filed August 4, 2021; filed an amended per curiam opinion affirming the district court’s dismissal of federal prisoner Paul Pavulak’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition; denied a petition for panel rehearing; and denied on behalf of the court a petition for rehearing en banc, in a case in which Pavulak challenged two sentencing enhancements—one under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(e), another under 18 U.S.C. § 3559(e)(1)—applied after his conviction on multiple counts of federal sex…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.