Connie Dietrich v. the Boeing Company

Good Law
14 F.4th 1089
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 1, 202119-56409California3,945 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bennett, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CONNIE DIETRICH, an individual, No. 19-56409 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:19-cv-04291-

JAK-PJW

THE BOEING COMPANY, improperly denominated as The Boeing Company, individually and as OPINION successor by merger to McDonnell Douglas Corporation, successor by merger with Douglas Aircraft Company, Defendant-Appellant,

and

AUTOZONE WEST, INC., AKA

Autozone, Inc., individually and as successor in interest to Chief Auto Parts, Inc.; BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC, as successor by merger to Borg-Warner Corporation;

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

individually and as successor in interest to Allied Signal, Inc., individually and as successor in interest to Bendix Corporation;

KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY INC;

MASONEILAN INTERNATIONAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to Mason-Neilan Regulator Company and Annin Valve Co.;

METALCLAD INSULATION LLC, FKA

Metalclad Insulation Corporation; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., individually and as successor in interest to Owens-Illinois Glass Company; SOCO WEST, INC., Brenntag West, Inc. f/k/a SOCO-Lynch Corporation successor in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.