Karen Stromberg v. Qualcomm Inc.

Bad Law
14 F.4th 1059
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 29, 202119-15159California8,648 words

Opinion

Opinion

R. Nelson, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAREN STROMBERG; SAMUEL No. 19-15159

ROECKER; THOMAS LAMMEL; MARY

GALLOWAY; DANIELLE LAGRAVE; D.C. No. THOMAS MCMAHON; BOARDSPORTS 5:17-md-02773-

SCHOOL LLC; PATRICK BENAD; LHK

LINDSEY CARR; RENEE ACOSTA;

PATRICIA BURNESS; CAROL HARRIS;

ROBERT LINKS; NICHELLE LYONS; OPINION

NUALA VIGNOLES; RACHEL L.

MILLER; JOHN WILLIAM KIEFER III;

MATTHEW MITCHELL; SUSAN

GONZALEZ-PENDER; TERESE

RUSSELL; SARAH KEY; DALIA

ZATLIN; BETH CRANDALL; CLARISSA

SIMON; KENDALL MARTIN; RODRIGO

SAPLA; REBECCA DAVIS; THOMAS

MCMANUS; KIMBERLY SCAVONE;

MELISSA JU; CHRIS THOMPSON;

MARTHA COUNTESS; KAREN HOOD;

JAIME MARTIN; ADRIAN ESTEBAN;

JEFFREY DAVIS; ERICSSON

BROADBENT; PAUL SCOTT ERVIN;

CARALYN TADA; NAGORE MILES;

BETHANY RISING; JIYING SPENCER;

DAYAN CRUTCHER; CATHERINE

SCHMIDLIN; ALLISON TRIPP;

LINDSAY SMITH; KATIE SMITH;

KIRSTEN LUENZ; LAUREL VENER;

STEPHEN JUDGE; SETH SALENGER; SCOTT HANSEN; JOSEPH

KOVACEVICH; MICHELLE REYNOLDS;

GEORGE MARUT; JANET ACKERMAN;

ALAN SCHLAIKJER; LORI LANDES;

JOYCE GRANTZ; GABRIELLE KURDT;

JOHN SOLAK; TODD ESPINOSA;

ANDREW…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.