California River Watch v. City of Vacaville
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, No. 20-16605 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:17-cv-00524-
KJM-KJN
CITY OF VACAVILLE,
Defendant-Appellee. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 14, 2021 San Francisco, California
Filed September 29, 2021
Before: A. Wallace Tashima and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges, and Douglas L. Rayes, * District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Bumatay; Dissent by Judge Tashima
* The Honorable Douglas L. Rayes, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **
Environmental Law
The panel vacated the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the City of Vacaville and remanded for further proceedings in a citizen suit brought by California River Watch under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
River Watch claimed that the City’s water wells were contaminated by a carcinogen called hexavalent chromium, which in turn…