United States v. Jason Schaefer

Good Law
13 F.4th 875
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202119-30266California10,671 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bea, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-30266 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:17-CR-00400-HZ-

JASON PAUL SCHAEFER,

Defendant-Appellant. OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 13, 2021 Seattle, Washington

Filed September 16, 2021

Before: David M. Ebel, * Carlos T. Bea, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Bea

* The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. SUMMARY **

Criminal Law

The panel affirmed a criminal judgment in a case in which a jury convicted Jason Schaefer of a variety of offenses, including assault on a federal officer (18 U.S.C. § 111(a)–(b)) and possession of an unregistered destructive device (26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861(d), 5871).

The panel held that the district court did not err in finding that Schaefer knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel. Schaefer did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.