United States v. William Green

Good Law
12 F.4th 970
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 202120-50257California3,330 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-50257 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cr-00938-LAB-

WILLIAM GREEN,

Defendant-Appellant. OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Hon. Larry A. Burns, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2021 * Pasadena, California

Filed September 8, 2021

Before: Richard A. Paez, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Callahan; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Paez

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). SUMMARY **

Criminal Law

The panel affirmed a criminal judgment in a case in which the district court imposed a condition of supervised release that the defendant may not “patronize any place” where sexually explicit “materials or entertainment are the primary material or entertainment available.”

The panel held that the condition bars the defendant from visiting a free pornography website. The panel wrote that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.