Daniel Chavez v. David Robinson

Good Law
12 F.4th 978
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 202118-36083California19,384 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL MIKE CHAVEZ, No. 18-36083 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:11-cv-03025-AA

DAVID R. ROBINSON; LISA

MOORE, OPINION

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 22, 2020 San Francisco, California

Filed September 8, 2021

Before: Marsha S. Berzon and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and Ivan L.R. Lemelle,* District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Ikuta; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Berzon

* The Honorable Ivan L.R. Lemelle, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. SUMMARY**

Civil Rights

The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Daniel Chavez alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when, as a condition of his supervised release and while his appeal of his conviction was pending, he was required to complete a sex offender…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.